I just reread your comment and am trying to understand. Are you saying there was another post--one critical of the project--and that you responded to that? If so, the critical post has also been deleted. I'm sure the agenda here is to eliminate earmarks, and certainly to be critical of those that remain; however, it is interesting that whoever is controlling the site left my positive comment but deleted yours and one that was critical.
That's very interesting. There were no comments on this project when I was on before. I would certainly be interested in debating the issue with anyone who cares to comment. I am pretty much a novice at this kind of online debate and not sure how it should work. Who do you think would be authorized to remove something from the site?
